DUI attorneys use a variety of tactics to contest blood test results in court with the goal of raising questions about the reliability or admissibility of the evidence. How they contest these findings is as follows:
Chain of Custody Issues: Attorneys examine the blood sample’s chain of custody. The integrity and dependability of the sample as evidence may be called into question if there are any anomalies or gaps in the documentation of its treatment, storing, or transportation.
Testing Protocols and Procedures: Fairfax DUI Lawyer contest the protocols used in the taking, storing, and analyzing of blood samples. To guarantee accuracy, they look at whether the testing facility followed set procedures, calibrated its equipment, and handled it properly.
Records of Calibration and Maintenance: Access to the testing equipment’s calibration and maintenance records is a demand made by attorneys. The accuracy of the blood test findings may be questioned if there are any anomalies or mistakes in the upkeep or calibration of the equipment.
Independent forensic experts may be called upon by attorneys to testify in court using their skills as expert witnesses. These specialists point out potential flaws or restrictions in the testing process and contest the methodology utilized to analyze the blood sample.
Allegations of Contamination or manipulation: Attorneys look into possible cases of contamination or manipulation with the blood sample. They contend that outside variables may have impacted the sample’s integrity, producing erroneous results, by looking at the handling protocols and storage settings.
Cross-Examination of Prosecution Witnesses: Throughout the trial process, attorneys closely question witnesses from the prosecution, such as laboratory technicians or specialists who handled the blood sample analysis. Their objective is to reveal any discrepancies, inadequacies, or possible prejudices that might compromise the validity of the findings.
Medical Conditions and Other Theories: Fairfax DUI Lawyer investigate any past medical issues the defendant may have had that could affect the findings of the blood test. They might offer scientific proof that points to variables other than alcohol intake that could influence blood alcohol content levels.
DUI attorneys hope to refute the validity, precision, and admissibility of blood test findings in court by using these tactics. In DUI cases, successfully raising doubts about the reliability of this evidence can have a big influence and possibly result in lower charges or case dismissals.
